I found this article at The Public Discourse, by Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez, so clinically dispassionate that it was like watching a dissection with words as cutlery. For example: “The living individual after brain death…is similar to a sustained torso and thus is not a human being.” Or: “…any entity that entirely lacks a brain and the capacity to develop a brain is not a human being.” And: “…the decapitated body and the totally brain-dead individual are similar to the waist-down unit…” In addition to ‘units’ and ‘entities,’ there are “homeostasis” and “genetic-epigenetic constitution,” and constructions like “teratomas or complete hydatidiform moles” would send me running to the bookshelf for a copy of Gray’s Anatomy if I owned one. I used to be fond of the word “capacity” until I was beaten over the head with it six times in one short paragraph. “Animals” and “organisms” are everywhere in this coroner’s slab of an essay, the inevitable result, I suppose, when the question of what constitutes a living human being is the subject of today’s autopsy.


